Brokerlines Atlas

How Brokerlines Atlas reduced manual submission preparation by 26% and routing time by 35%.

case image

AT A GLANCE

The client is a U.S.-based specialty and commercial insurance organization working through brokers and internal underwriting teams across multiple product lines. Brokerlines Atlas provided underwriting submission software that consolidated questionnaires, supporting documents, risk details, and submission status into a single, structured process.

The insurance submission management software combined document collection, risk-data extraction, completeness checks, task creation, underwriting queues, and pipeline reporting. Complete submissions reached underwriters with clearer risk information and fewer manual preparation steps.

Across selected workflows, manual submission preparation decreased by 26%, time to prepare underwriter-ready submissions by 34%, and routing time to underwriting queues by 35%.

THE CLIENT

The client is a U.S. specialty and commercial insurer working with brokers and internal underwriting teams across multiple product lines.

Each submission can include policy information, risk documents, pricing inputs, supporting records, and broker communications. These materials must be reviewed and structured before an underwriter can evaluate the risk.

The organization’s insurance underwriting software operated alongside CRM, policy administration, document management, and broker communication systems supporting different parts of the submission lifecycle.

Consistent risk information and clear submission status were therefore essential to keeping underwriting teams focused on assessment and decision-making.

BUSINESS CHALLENGE

Broker submissions arrived in different formats and often contained missing, duplicated, or inconsistently structured information. Underwriters spent time checking documents, extracting risk details, and following up with brokers before substantive risk assessment could begin.

  • Inconsistent submissions. Brokers submitted risk information and supporting documents in different formats.
  • Incomplete information. Missing fields and documents created repeated follow-up work before assessment.
  • Manual risk-data preparation. Underwriters extracted and structured key parameters before reviewing the risk itself.
  • Limited pipeline visibility. Submission status was spread across broker communication, CRM, policy administration, and document systems.
  • Unclear priorities. Teams needed a more consistent way to identify complete submissions, pending actions, and underwriting workload.

The insurer needed broker submission automation to reduce repetitive preparation and create a more consistent path from broker intake to underwriter review.

An underwriting workbench was also required to give underwriting teams a consolidated view of submission status, priorities, missing information, and pending actions.

The scope required insurance software development capable of connecting the new workflow with existing CRM, policy administration, and document management systems.

SOLUTION SUMMARY

Computools mapped broker submission flows, underwriting queues, document requirements, and existing policy administration dependencies before designing a structured journey for brokers and underwriting teams.

The platform used underwriting workflow automation to move submissions through intake, validation, follow-up, prioritization, and assignment. Rules identified missing information and generated the required follow-up tasks before underwriter review.

A structured insurance document intake process brought risk documents and supporting materials into the relevant submission record, reducing manual consolidation across channels.

The broker portal guided brokers through questionnaires, document collection, and outstanding information requirements while exposing submission status throughout the process.

OCR and AI-supported insurance risk data extraction, converting information from uploaded documents into structured risk parameters that could be validated before assessment.

The resulting insurance submission intake process connected broker-provided data with underwriting queues, pipeline dashboards, decision history, override logs, and existing insurance systems.

IMPACT

Brokerlines Atlas reduced administrative preparation before risk assessment and improved the consistency of submissions reaching underwriting teams:

  • Manual effort in broker submission preparation decreased by 26%.
  • Time to prepare complete submissions for underwriter review decreased by 34%.
  • Incomplete submissions decreased by 29%.
  • Routing time to underwriting queues decreased by 35%.

Role-specific interfaces created through web development gave brokers and underwriting teams clearer visibility into submission status, missing information, priorities, and pending actions.

To keep risk information consistent across connected systems, the team used data engineering to align structured submission data with CRM, policy administration, and document records. This improved the reliability of underwriting preparation and pipeline reporting.

Document-heavy submissions also benefited from targeted AI development for classification, risk-data extraction, and information validation. Underwriters retained final control over pricing, eligibility, and approvals.

Submission history, override logs, and role-based access strengthened auditability and made changes easier to trace throughout the underwriting preparation process.

WHY COMPUTOOLS

The engagement required coordinated expertise across underwriting operations, broker-facing UX, document processing, structured risk data, and legacy insurance integrations.

Computools brought these disciplines into one delivery team, allowing business rules, data requirements, and integration dependencies to be validated together before implementation.

This reduced ambiguity across broker and underwriter workflows and gave the insurer a controlled path for expanding automation while preserving existing underwriting authority.

Launch your software solution within 1-3 months instead of years. Unlock tomorrow. Build a future-ready business through innovation.

STORY IN DEPTH

Background

The insurer received submissions from brokers across several product lines. Each package could contain questionnaires, policy information, risk documents, pricing inputs, and supporting communication.

The information arrived in inconsistent formats and at different levels of completeness. Underwriters therefore spent part of their time checking documents, extracting risk parameters, identifying missing information, and following up with brokers before substantive assessment could begin.

Submission status was also distributed across CRM, policy administration, document tools, and broker communications, limiting visibility into pipeline progress and workload.

Approach to solution

Computools began by mapping broker submission workflows, underwriting queues, document requirements, and dependencies across existing insurance systems.

The team identified which information brokers needed to provide, which risk parameters had to be available before review, where incomplete submissions created delays, and how cases moved into underwriting queues.

A structured broker journey was then designed around questionnaire completion, document upload, data extraction, completeness validation, follow-up tasks, submission prioritization, and routing.

OCR and AI converted relevant document content into structured risk data. Validation rules identified missing information before submission handoff, while task creation supported follow-up with brokers.

REST-based integrations connected submission data with CRM, policy administration, and document management systems. Pipeline dashboards provided visibility into submission status, broker activity, pending actions, and workload distribution.

Computools role

Computools was responsible for:

  • analyzing broker submission workflows;
  • mapping underwriting queues and system dependencies;
  • defining broker and underwriter user journeys;
  • designing structured submission questionnaires;
  • implementing document intake and classification;
  • configuring risk-data extraction and validation;
  • defining missing-information checks;
  • creating automated follow-up tasks;
  • building submission queues and prioritization logic;
  • integrating CRM, policy administration, and document systems;
  • implementing pipeline dashboards;
  • adding submission history, override logs, and role-based access

Key decisions and outcomes

Submission completeness became an explicit part of the underwriting workflow, allowing teams to identify missing documents and risk information before a case reached substantive assessment. Structured questionnaires and document processing reduced variation across broker submissions and created a more consistent information set for underwriters.

Automated preparation remained separate from underwriting authority. OCR and AI-supported extraction and validation, while pricing, eligibility, overrides, and approvals remained under human control.

Submission priority, pending actions, and readiness were consolidated into a single underwriting view. Integrations kept CRM, policy, and document information connected to the submission record, giving operations teams clearer pipeline visibility without creating another isolated data source.

DESIGN

The design focused on helping brokers submit complete information and giving underwriting teams a clear view of risk data, readiness, priority, and pending actions.

USER PERSONA → SITE MAP → WIREFRAMES → USER INTERFACE

USER PERSONA

Defining the needs of an underwriting operations leader responsible for submission quality, pipeline visibility, and workload distribution.

SITE MAP

Organizing broker intake, documents, risk information, underwriting queues, pipeline reporting, and administration around the submission lifecycle.

WIREFRAMES

Testing broker intake, document review, risk-data validation, underwriting queues, and pipeline interactions before interface development.

USER INTERFACE

Creating role-based views that make submission readiness, risk information, priorities, and pending actions easier to assess.

DIGITAL PLATFORM & TECHNOLOGY

Brokerlines Atlas combined a TypeScript-based web stack with structured risk-data storage, cloud infrastructure, document recognition, and REST-based integrations.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY

Computools used a Scrum-based delivery model with two-week iterations and regular validation by underwriting, broker operations, product, compliance, and technical stakeholders. Each iteration focused on a specific part of the submission lifecycle, including broker intake, document processing, risk data validation, follow-up tasks, underwriting queues, integrations, or pipeline reporting. Changes were reviewed against representative submission scenarios before subsequent development.

AI-assisted functions were validated separately for document classification, risk-data extraction, and information validation. Integration, access-control, override, and audit requirements were tested throughout development to reduce release risks across connected insurance systems.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY

PROJECT TIMELINE

image

WHAT OUR CLIENT SAID

Before Brokerlines Atlas, a submission could look complete at first glance and still be missing the one document or risk detail an underwriter needed. That meant extra emails, manual checks, and a lot of time spent getting the file ready. Now the team can see what is missing much earlier, and underwriters start with a much cleaner submission.

CONTACT US TO GET A COST-EFFECTIVE
PROJECT ESTIMATE

Thank you for your message!

Your request will be carefully researched by our experts. We will get in touch with you within one business day.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

01.
We deeply analyse your request.
02.
We create project roadmap, accelerating your time-to-value.
03.
We co-scope features, minimizing project risk upfront.
04.
We submit a comprehensive project proposal.
Trusted by: